[160] Donald L. Taylor, “Courtship as a Social Institution in the United States, 1930-1945,” Social Forces, XXV (October, 1946), 68.
[161] For example: “id,” “ion,” “alga.”
[162] Samuel H. Jameson, “Social Nearness among Welfare Institutions,” Sociology and Social Research, XV (March-April, 1931), 322.
[163] The natural scientists, too, use many Latinate terms, but these are chiefly “name” words, for which there are no real substitutes.
[164] See J. B. Greenough and G. L. Kittredge, Words and Their Ways in English Speech (New York, 1931), pp. 94-99.
[165] James R. Masterson and Wendell Brooks Phillips, Federal Prose: How to Write in and/or for Washington (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1948), p. 10.
[166] Cf., for example, Madison in No. 10.
[167] It is possible that there exists also a concrete understanding, which differs qualitatively from abstract or scientific understanding and is needed to supplement it, particularly when we are dealing with moral phenomena (see Andrew Bongiorno, “Poetry as an Educational Instrument,” Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, XXXIII [Autumn, 1947], 508-9).
[168] Cf. Aristotle, ‘Rhetoric, 1410 b: “... for when the poet calls old age ‘stubble,’ he produces in us a knowledge and information by means of a common genus; for both are past their prime.”
[169] International Encyclopedia of Unified Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1941), II, No. 8, 7.