[71] He seems finally to have been inclined to believe that they were so.
[72] Third edition, as vol. vi. of Collected Works (Paris, 1848).
[73] Vide Fourier’s Œuvres, tome ii. pp. 142-147, and references there given. Lorenz von Stein sets a high value on the philosophical value of this classification, as compared with similar efforts of Pythagoras and Bossuet. Although appreciative, he criticises Fourier vigorously, and shows the contradictions involved in his classification (vide Stein, “Sociale Bewegung,” Bd. ii. SS. 276-285).
[74] Always thus designated by Fourier. He attaches such a reproachful meaning to it that the word has an ugly sound to one immediately after reading his works.
[75] Vide “Fourier et son Système,” par Madame Gatti de Gammond (3d ed. 1839), p. 86.
[76] “Vices de Nos Procédés Industriels” (1824; 2d ed., with the title “Aperçus sur les Procédés Industriels,” 1840) and “Nouvelles Transactions Sociales, Religieuses et Politiques de Virtomnius” (1832).
[77] “Fourier et son Système” (1st ed. 1838; 3d ed. 1839, pp. 384). Madame de Gammond modifies Fourier’s views concerning the relations of the sexes in her presentation, as would naturally be expected of a lady of culture.
[78] Wrote “Paroles de Providence” (1835).
[79] “Fourier, Sa Vie et sa Théorie” (5th ed. 1872).
[80] “Études sur la Science Sociale” (2 vols. 1831-34).