in equations 15 and 16 ([p. 101]) corresponding to this value of
is .874.
Instead, however, of taking the result of this graphical evaluation of
, it is more accurate to reduce each of the observations on
to
by means of the foregoing value of
in equations 15 and 16 ([p. 101]) corresponding to this value of
is .874.
Instead, however, of taking the result of this graphical evaluation of
, it is more accurate to reduce each of the observations on
to
by means of the foregoing value of