without the Suppoſition of theſe Globuli, which 'tis not ſo eaſie to evince, I think we may probably enough conceive in general, that the Eye may be Variouſly affected, not only by the Entire Beams of Light that fall upon it as they are ſuch, but by the Order, and by the Degree of Swiftneſs, and in a word by the Manner according to which the Particles that compoſe each Particular Beam arrive at the Senſory, ſo that whatever be the Figure of the Little Corpuſcles, of which the Beams of Light conſiſt, not only the Celerity or Slowneſs of their Revolution or Rotation in reference to their Progreſſive Motion, but their more Abſolute Celerity, their Direct or Undulating Motion, and other Accidents, which may attend their Appulſe to the Eye, may fit them to make Differing Impreſſions on it.
4. Secondly, For theſe and the like Conſiderations, Pyrophilus, I muſt deſire that you would look upon this little Treatiſe, not as a Diſcourſe written Principally to maintain any of the fore-mention'd Theories, Excluſively to all others, or ſubſtitute a New one of my Own, but as the beginning of a Hiſtory of Colours, upon which, when you and your Ingenious friends ſhall have Enrich'd it, a Solid Theory may be
ſafely built. But yet becauſe this Hiſtory is not meant barely for a Regiſter of the things recorded in it, but for an Apparatus to a ſound and comprehenſitive Hypotheſis, I thought fit, ſo to temper the whole Diſcourſe, as to make it as conducible, as conveniently I can to that End, and therefore I have not ſcrupled to let you ſee that I was willing, as to ſave you the labour of Cultivating ſome Theories that I thought would never enable you to reach the Ends you aim at, ſo to contract your Enquiries into a Narrow compaſs, for both which purpoſes I thought it requiſite to do theſe two things, the One, to ſet down ſome Experiments which by the help of the Reflections and Inſinuations that attend them, may aſſiſt you to diſcover the Infirmneſs and Inſufficiency both of the common Peripatetick Doctrine, and of the now more applauded Theory of the Chymists about Colour, becauſe thoſe two Doctrines having Poſſeſs'd themſelves, the one of the moſt part of the Schools, and the other of the Eſteem of the Generality ef Phyſicians and other Learned Men, whoſe Profeſſions and Ways of Study do not exact that they ſhould Scrupulouſly examine the very Firſt and Simpleſt Principles of Nature, I fear'd it would be to
little purpoſe, without doing ſomething to diſcover the Inſufficiency of theſe Hypotheſes, that I ſhould, (which was the Other thing I thought requiſite for me to do) ſet down among my other Experiments thoſe in the greateſt Number, that may let you ſee, that, till I ſhall be Better Inform'd, I encline to take Colour to be a Modification of Light, and would invite you chiefly to Cultivate that Hypotheſis, and Improve it to the making out of the Generation of Particular Colours, as I have Endeavour'd to apply it to the Explication of Whiteneſs and Blackneſs.
5. Thirdly. But, Pyrophilus, though this be at preſent the Hypotheſis I preferr, yet I propoſe it but in a General Senſe, teaching only that the Beams of Light, Modify'd by the Bodies whence they are ſent (Reflected or Refracted) to the Eye, produce there that Kind of Senſation, Men commonly call Colour; But whether I think this Modification of the Light to be perform'd by Mixing it with Shades, or by Varying the Proportion of the Progreſs and Rotation of the Carteſian Globuli Cæleſtes, or by ſome other way which I am not now to mention, I pretend not here to Declare. Much leſs do I pretend to Determine, or ſcarce ſo much as to Hope to
know all that were requiſite to be Known, to give You, or even my Self, a perfect account of the Theory of Viſion and Colours, for in Order to ſuch an undertaking I would firſt Know what Light is, and if it be a Body (as a Body or the Motion of a Body it ſeems to be) what Kind of Corpuſcles for Size and Shape it conſiſts of, with what Swiftneſs they move Forwards, and Whirl about their own Centres. Then I would Know the Nature of Refraction, which I take to be one of the Abſtruſeſt things (not to explicate Plauſibly, but to explicate Satisfactorily) that I have met with in Phyſicks; I would further Know what Kind and what Degree of Commixture of Darkneſs or Shades is made by Refractions or Reflections, or both, in the Superficial particles of thoſe Bodies, that being Shin'd upon, conſtantly exhibit the one, for Inſtance, a Blew, the other a Yellow, the third a Red Colour; I would further Know why this Contemperation of Light and Shade, that is made, for Example, by the Skin of a Ripe Cherry, ſhould exhibit a Red, and not a Green, and the Leaf of the ſame Tree ſhould exhibit a Green rather than a Red; and indeed, Laſtly, why ſince the Light that is Modify'd into theſe Colours conſiſts but of Corpuſcles
moved againſt the Retina or Pith of the Optick Nerve, it ſhould there not barely give a Stroak, but produce a Colour, whereas a Needle wounding likewiſe the Eye, would not produce Colour but Pain. Theſe, and perhaps other things I ſhould think requiſite to be Known, before I ſhould judge my Self to have fully Comprehended the True and Whole Nature of Colours; and therefore, though by making the Experiments and Reflections deliver'd in this Paper, I have endeavour'd ſomewhat to Leſſen my Ignorance in this Matter, and think it far more Deſireable to diſcover a Little, than to diſcover Nothing, yet I pretend but to make it Probable by the Experiments I mention, that ſome Colours may be Plauſibly enough Explicated in the General by the Doctrine here propos'd; For whenſoever I would Deſcend to the Minute and Accurate Explication of Particulars, I find my Self very Senſible of the great Obſcurity of things, without excepting thoſe which we never ſee but when they are Enlightned, and confeſs with Scaliger[a]5], Latet natura hæc, (ſays he, Speaking of that of Colour) & ſicut aliarum rerum ſpecies in profundiſſima caligine inſcitiæ humanæ.
