Edinburgh:
Printed by W. and R. Chambers.
CONTENTS OF VOL. II.
| PAGE | |
|---|---|
| REIGN OF CHARLES I.: 1625-1637, | [1] |
| REIGN OF CHARLES I.: 1637-1649, | [105] |
| INTERREGNUM: 1649-1660, | [174] |
| REIGN OF CHARLES II.: 1660-1673, | [255] |
| REIGN OF CHARLES II.: 1673-1685, | [349] |
| REIGN OF JAMES VII.: 1685-1688, | [469] |
| GENERAL INDEX, | [503] |
Illustrations.
VOL. II.
| [Frontispiece] Vignette.—DUNNOTTAR CASTLE. | |
| PAGE | |
| BOG AN GICHT CASTLE, | [46] |
| HOLYROOD PALACE, AS BEFORE THE FIRE OF 1650, | [205] |
| MONS MEG, | [468] |
| THE JOUGS—AT DUDDINGSTON CHURCH, | [501] |
| HALF-GLAZED WINDOW OF SEVENTEENTH CENTURY, | [524] |
DOMESTIC ANNALS OF SCOTLAND.
REIGN OF CHARLES I.: 1625-1637.
James I. was peaceably succeeded on the throne by his son Charles I., then in the twenty-fifth year of his age. The administration of Scottish affairs continued to be conducted by the Privy Council in Edinburgh. For the endowment of the Episcopal Church now established, the king (1625) attempted a revocation of the church-lands from the lay nobles and others into whose hands they had fallen; but this excited so strong a spirit of resistance, that he was obliged to give it up. He ended by issuing (1627) a commission to receive the surrender of impropriated tithes and benefices, and out of these, and the superiorities of the church-lands, to increase the provisions of the clergy. These proceedings, though legal, were unpopular. The nobles, alarmed for their property, began to lean towards the middle and humbler classes, who objected to a hierarchy on religious grounds solely. While all was smooth on the surface, while the lords of the Privy Council were full of expressions of servile obedience, while they, as well as all judges and magistrates, gave most loyal and regular attendance at church, and duly knelt at the communion—a strong spirit of discontent ran through society. The more zealous Presbyterians formed the habit of meeting in private houses for prayer and worship. They beheld with apprehension the tendency to medieval ceremonies which Charles, and his favourite councillor, Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury, were manifesting in England. That leaning to Arminianism which the English Church was also accused of—modifying Calvinism so far as to say that the perdition of sinners had been only foreseen, not decreed, and that God’s wrath against them was not to last for ever—was viewed with the utmost alarm in Scotland. The only means the king had of giving reassurance was to make a loud profession of horror for popery, and to practise all possible severities upon its adherents. That the king and his Council availed themselves of this chance, will be found abundantly evidenced in our chronicle.
It is rather remarkable, that the adjustment of the tithes by King Charles in 1627 has proved a most useful practical measure, in annulling a certain class of disputes between the clergy and their flocks; anticipating, in short, the valuable commutation acts of England and Ireland by upwards of two centuries.