[61] Backus, i. 147.
[62] Backus, i. 148. Knowles, p. 198.
[63] Elton, in notes to Callender, p. 230. Knowles, p. 208.
[65] See Tracts on Liberty of Conscience, pp. 214-225.
[66] Bloudy Tenent Washed, p. 1.
[67] Bloody Tenent yet more Bloody, pp. 4, 290. The only edition known to us of the prisoner’s arguments with Mr. Cotton’s reply, is of the date 1646, with the following title: “The Controversie concerning Liberty of Conscience in Matters of Religion, truly stated, and distinctly and plainly handled by Mr. John Cotton of Boston in New England. By way of answer to some arguments to the contrary sent unto him, wherein you have, against all cavils of turbulent spirits, clearly manifested wherein liberty of conscience in matters of religion ought to be permitted, and in what cases it ought not, by the said Mr. Cotton. London. Printed for Thomas Banks. 1646.” It is a quarto pamphlet of fourteen pages, and signed John Cotton, and agrees with Williams’s copy of it in the “Bloudy Tenent.”
[69] Bloody Tenent Washed, pp. 150, 192.
[70] Bloody Tenent more Bloody, pp. 222, 291.