Accounting theory and practice, Volume 2 (of 3)

by Roy B. Kester

It is true that if the periodic amounts of the estimate for depreciation and the sinking fund are practically the same, and if provision is made only for the sinking fund reserve, there will be in that reserve a sufficient amount to care for the depreciation. Assuming the life of the asset and the life of the bonds to be the same, such a policy means simply that the asset, usually a fixed asset, has been converted by use into current funds which have been applied to the liquidation of the bonds. There has been no reservation of real profits for this purpose. Upon the complete depreciation of the asset, the book value not having been written down in the meantime because no depreciation has been booked for it, the asset must be charged against the reserve, thereby mutually extinguishing each other. No principles of accounting are necessarily violated.

Failure to book the depreciation as such results, however, in an inflated showing of net profits. If the sinking fund reserve is charged against current profit and loss instead of surplus, the showing of net profits is thus corrected but there has been no real reservation of profits, the sinking fund reserve being in reality a valuation account for the depreciating asset, and thus the letter of the trust agreement is violated. If the intent of that agreement was to increase proprietorship, as discussed on page 456 above, this procedure will not accomplish that purpose.

Provision for both depreciation and the reserve does not effect a double charge against profits. As pointed out above, the one is an expense charge without which true profits cannot be shown, and the other is a charge against real profits, resulting in a lessening of dividends. Where there is no trust agreement to compel the creation of a sinking fund reserve, it is merely a matter of financial policy as to how the bonds shall be redeemed, and there is no objection in theory to the conversion of the depreciating asset to that purpose. Much more is this the case when the mortgaged asset is a wasting asset, the exhaustion of which is inevitably bound up with the operation of the business. Here there is no need either to increase proprietorship or even to maintain capital intact, and the conversion of the wasting asset, without providing for its replacement, to the payment of the bond issue is legitimate and wholly unobjectionable as a financial policy.

CHAPTER XXVI
PROBLEMS IN CONNECTION WITH
THE PROFIT AND LOSS SUMMARY

Interrelation of Profit and Loss and Balance Sheet

Because of the supplemental character of the profit and loss summary to the balance sheet, no study of the latter is complete or adequate, whether viewed from the standpoint of valuation or from any other aspect, without at least a consideration of the profit and loss summary in its larger bearings. Some general features of the summary will here be considered, followed in the next chapter by a discussion of its terminology, form, and content.

Every change in an asset which is not reflected among the other assets or the liabilities relates to proprietorship; or, as stated from the profit and loss point of view, every change in proprietorship, except it be merely a transfer between proprietorship items, is reflected as a change in assets or liabilities. The original contribution of capital is reflected among the assets. Other items of vested or permanent proprietorship have been discussed in Chapter XXIII, “Surplus and Reserves,” leaving for consideration here the temporary proprietorship, i.e., the profit and loss items. Of these, every income item results either in an increase of assets or a decrease of liability, while every expense shows as a decrease of assets or increase of liabilities.

The relation of the profit and loss phase of an enterprise to the problem of valuation is apparent—the majority of the changes in value of the assets being connected with profit and loss activities. Thus sales result in cash or claims against customers, and a valuation of these claims gives the amount of bad debts expense. The valuation of fixed assets determines the amount of depreciation expense. On the valuation of the stock-in-trade depends the cost of goods sold and therefore the gross profit. Only those profit and loss items which are realized or settled in cash are not dependent upon the valuation of related assets, and even here, in so far as cash must under some circumstances be valued, these may be, at least remotely, dependent upon valuation. As, therefore, the balance sheet is primarily an expression of opinion and judgment, rather than a statement of fact, so also in large measure must the profit and loss summary be regarded as an expression of opinion. The same factors which enter into appraisals and valuations determine profits and losses.

Periodic Adjustments

In Chapter XXIII, on “Surplus and Reserves,” attention has been called to the use of a statement of surplus for the purpose of showing the changes which take place in surplus from period to period. These changes are due to profits earned, dividends declared, extraordinary profit and loss items not handled through the profit and loss summary, and adjustments in profit and loss applicable to previous fiscal periods—such adjustments being necessary because of errors in the profit and loss summaries of those periods, due to insufficient information for making an accurate summary at the time. The periodic profit and loss summary is limited in its purpose and scope to the activities of the current period and to an equitable share of those income and expense items running over a number of periods. Because the adjustments just mentioned are frequently necessary, the periodic profit and loss summary as it appears on the books is never an entirely accurate reflection of the profit and loss activities for any period, but it is usually sufficiently so to serve all current needs. When, however, the earning capacity of a concern needs to be judged with great accuracy, over a number of periods, it is not safe to depend entirely upon the periodic profit and loss summaries. It may, for example, be necessary to judge earning capacity because of a contemplated sale or merger. Here the basis for determining value should be not the earnings of one period but the average of several periods. It then becomes necessary to reconstruct the periodic profit and loss summaries as carried on the books in the light of any additional information that may have become available later.