Charles II., visited Shrewsbury. Struck with surprise at the width and cleanliness of the streets, he expressed, a wish to elevate it into a city. The burgesses, who appear to have left their first love, and to have degenerated in their affections for kings, refused his offer in such an independent spirit that they obtained for themselves the designation of “Proud Salopians”—a designation which is often applied to us as a term indicating that we are haughty, stiff, conceited. Is there not something honourable in it? The title means that once upon a time we performed the courageous feat of declining the wish of a king—we said “no” to a sovereign—we rejected the proffered compliment of being exalted by a monarch. Strange but re-assuring phenomenon from the descendants of the zealots of Richard II., and from the devotees of Charles I.!
The last royal visit to Shrewsbury—and, as we have seen, there was a number of them, chiefly of either a disturbing or a worthless sort—was made by James II. in August, 1687. Of course, the indispensable feasting, which is a fundamental element in our glorious British Constitution, was held in great style. A magnificent court was kept in the Council House on August 25th; and the next day the King left this town for Whitchurch. With his departure end our stories of the calls of kings on their subjects at Shrewsbury.
HISTORICAL GUIDE THROUGH THE TOWN.
The objects of historical interest in Shrewsbury are most numerous. We come upon them in every street. We meet them at every corner. We hear the voices of the past everywhere about us. We find ourselves associated with something that had a beginning in centuries gone by—something that has stood the storms of ages and been spared in the disturbances of the centuries—something that is rich in memories of old—something connected with circumstances or events which, if we only thought of them, would furnish us with lessons in stones, and make our daily travelling of the streets an entertainment. Shrewsbury, of course, is not, in this respect, an exceptional town; but it is wealthy beyond most others. We cannot notice at elaborate length the remaining
“Memorials and things of fame
That do renown this city;”
but let us rapidly run over the town in as straight a course as its divergent streets permit.
Starting from the Railway Station we see
THE CASTLE.
On the site of the castle a Saxon fortress originally stood. In 1070 Roger de Montgomery built the castle by enlarging the fortress and demolishing fifty-one houses occupied by the burgesses. The destruction of this property was not accompanied by any diminution in the public taxes, and the burgesses complained of their grievance, but without effect. The Earl’s two sons, who succeeded him in possession of the castle, refused to redress their wrongs. In the reign of Henry I. it became the property of the Crown, and certain portions of land were parcelled out as positions of defence in the event of any necessity arising. A governor was appointed to command it, a constable to guard it, and a chamberlain to see that it was kept in good repair. It was usually held by the sheriff of the county to enable him the more powerfully to defend his bailwick. It was surrendered to the Parliamentary army in 1644, and General Mytton was made governor. He was succeeded by Humphrey Mackworth, who appointed as lieutenant of the castle Captain Hill. Hill is described as “a prodigal, drunken fellow, who before the war, was a barber in Shrewsbury.” He was disliked by both the people of the town and the garrison, and in order to depose him from his position, a conspiracy was formed. He was enticed to an alehouse outside the gates of the town. The gates were closed to prevent his return, his personal property was thrown over them, the town instantly was in an uproar, and he was compelled to fly for his life. In the fifteenth year of Charles II. the burgesses were ordered by a quo warranto to deliver up the castle to the king. The garrison then consisted of two companies. In the time of James II. all the cannon and match, with most of the muskets, were removed by royal command. Charles II. presented the Castle to Lord Newport, afterwards Earl Bradford. Lord Newport had given the sum of £600 to Charles I. Perhaps the gift of the Castle by the second Charles was his acknowledgment of Newport’s pecuniary service to that relative who had the misfortune to lose his head. The Duke of Cleveland is now the owner of the Castle.
On Castle Gates, opposite the Independent Chapel, stood the Outer Castle Gate, which was formerly strengthened and defended with towers, portcullis, and fosse in a line with a road leading to the Smithfield. That portion of the town wall which extends towards the river was erected by Robert de Belesme, second son of the founder of the castle. Camden says it was never assaulted except in the Barons’ wars. A few yards higher stood the Inner or Burgess Gate, at right angles with the Schools. The Castle Walk on the left of Castle Gates was formed in 1790, and was called the Dana from the name of the person who suggested its formation.