[46] See Lechler, Apostolic and Post-Apostolic Times.
[47] See Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller and the Roman citizen.
[48] By Von Soden and Jülicher, although some interpolations are allowed. Even Pfleiderer admitted that it contained fragments of St. Paul's genuine writings, after Hilgenfeld had followed his leader Baur in rejecting it altogether. Lightfoot, T. K. Abbott, Zahn, and Sanday all defend its claims.
[49] Not by Davidson, however, nor more recently by Bacon or Moffatt. Dr. Horton (Century Bible) balances the arguments pro and con and refuses to decide either way.
[50] This is Harnach's view. On the other hand so independent a scholar and drastic a critic as Mr. Conybeare told the present writer that he had no doubt of their genuineness.
[51] Especially by Menégoz, Bruce, and Milligan.
[52] Still it is vindicated by Dr. Bigg, International Commentary.
[53] J. B. Mayor, The Epistle of St. James.
[54] E. g., Pfleiderer, Holtzmann, Jülicher, Harnach, the last regarding it as a collection of sermon notes put together by some unknown James in the second century. But are not its very archaic features against this view?
[55] As expounded by Gunkel, Bousset, and Charles.