To appreciate the importance of such a system of navigation, and exhibit some of the advantages of the American route, it may be well to compare it with the old route, by the way of the Cape, which will still remain the principal highway to the East.
“The Englishman,” says Lieut. Maury, “meets the American in all the markets of the world with the advantage of ten days or upward. Cut through the Isthmus, and instead of some ten days’ sail or more, the scale would be turned, and we shall have the advantage of some twenty days’ sail, thus making a difference of thirty or forty days under canvas.” The distance between New York, China, India, and Australia, and the west coast of South America exceeds that by way of Cape Horn from 8,000 to 14,000 miles.
To the States lying in the great basin of the Mississippi, and to all the cities situated on its navigable waters, the gain is much greater. These parts of the continent, now secluded by their position from direct trade with the west coast of South America and the Indies, will be brought into closer commercial relations with these ports of the world. With but one transshipment, the silk, teas, spices, and fabrics of India, China, Japan, and the Pacific Islands may be landed on the banks of the Mississippi, Missouri, and Ohio.
The following tables, taken from the Report of Lieut. Maury to the Committee on Naval Affairs, will show the sailing distance from New York and Liverpool to the principal ports beyond and around Cape Horn and the Cape of Good Hope. The distances to South and North Pacific ports are greatly reduced by the Darien or Panama route.
| FROM LIVERPOOL. | FROM NEW YORK. | |
|---|---|---|
| MILES. | MILES. | |
| To Calcutta, via Cape of Good Hope | 16,000 | 17,500 |
| Calcutta, via Cape Horn | 21,500 | 23,000 |
| Canton, via Cape Horn | 20,000 | 21,500 |
| Canton, via Cape of Good Hope | 18,000 | 19,500 |
| Valparaiso, via Cape Horn | 11,400 | 12,900 |
| Callao, via Cape Horn | 12,000 | 13,500 |
| Guayaquil, via Cape Horn | 12,800 | 14,300 |
| Panama, via Cape Horn | 14,500 | 16,000 |
| San Blas, via Cape Horn | 16,300 | 17,800 |
| Mazatlan, via Cape Horn | 16,500 | 18,000 |
| San Diego, via Cape Horn | 17,000 | 18,500 |
| San Francisco, via Cape Horn | 17,500 | 19,000 |
The following table shows the saving of time from New York by the new route, via the Isthmus of Panama, as compared with the old routes, via Cape Horn and Cape of Good Hope, to the places therein named, estimating the distance which a common trading ship will sail per day to be one hundred and ten miles, and calculating for the voyage out and home:
| FROM N. Y. TO | DISTANCE VIA CAPE OF GOOD HOPE. | LENGTH OF PASSAGE OUT AND HOME. | DISTANCE VIA; CAPE HORN. | LENGTH OF PASSAGE OUT AND HOME. | DISTANCE VIA THE ISTHMUS OF PANAMA. | LENGTH OF PASSAGE OUT AND HOME. | SAVING IN DISTANCE OVER THE ROUTE BY CAPE OF GOOD HOPE. | TIME SAVED BY ISTHMUS OVER TIME BY CAPE HOPE, OUT AND HOME. | SAVING IN DISTANCE OVER THE ROUTE BY CAPE HORN. | TIME SAVED BY ISTHMUS OVER TIME BY CAPE HOPE, OUT AND HOME. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MILES. | DAYS. | MILES. | DAYS. | MILES. | DAYS. | MILES. | DAYS. | MILES. | DAYS. | |
| Calcutta | 17,500 | 318 | 23,000 | 418 | 13,400 | 244 | 4,100 | 74 | 9,600 | 174 |
| Canton | 19,500 | 354 | 21,500 | 390 | 10,600 | 192 | 8,900 | 162 | 10,900 | 198 |
| Shanghai | 20,000 | 362 | 22,000 | 400 | 10,400 | 188 | 9,600 | 174 | 11,600 | 212 |
| Valparaiso | 12,900 | 234 | 4,800 | 86 | 8,100 | 148 | ||||
| Callao | 13,500 | 244 | 3,500 | 62 | 10,000 | 182 | ||||
| Guayaquil | 14,300 | 260 | 2,800 | 50 | 11,500 | 210 | ||||
| Panama | 16,000 | 290 | 2,000 | 36 | 14,000 | 254 | ||||
| San Blas | 17,800 | 322 | 3,800 | 68 | 14,000 | 254 | ||||
| Mazatlan | 18,000 | 326 | 4,000 | 72 | 14,000 | 254 | ||||
| San Diego | 18,500 | 336 | 4,500 | 82 | 14,000 | 254 | ||||
| San Francisco | 19,000 | 344 | 5,000 | 90 | 14,000 | 254 | ||||
| Wellington, N. Z. | 13,740 | 11,100 | 8,480 | 5,260 | 2,620 | |||||
| Melbourne, Australia | 13,230 | 12,720 | 9,890 | 3,340 | 2,830 | |||||
The following condensed statement, from tables carefully prepared by an advocate of intermarine canals, exhibits some of the commercial advantages depending upon the completion of the route:
Table showing the saving to the trade of the world, in insurance on vessels and cargoes, interest on cargoes, saving of wear and tear of ships, and saving of wages, provisions, etc., by using the Isthmus Canal:
| United States | $35,995,930 |
| England | 9,950,348 |
| France | 2,183,930 |
| Other countries | 1,400,000 |
| Total yearly saving | $49,530,208 |