[167] Prov. v. 22.
[168] Prov. xxviii. 14.
[169] ἐνταῦθα τὴν γνῶσιν πολυπραγμονεῖ appears in the text, which, with great probability, is supposed to be a marginal note which got into the text, the indicative being substituted fer the imper.
[170] Matt. x. 24, 25; Luke vi. 40.
[171] Adopting Sylburgius’ conjecture of τῳ δε for τὸ δε.
[172] Perhaps in allusion to the leper’s words to Christ, “If Thou wilt, Thou canst make me clean” (Mark i. 40).
[173] Prov. xxx. 3.
[174] Prov. xv. 8.
[175] Isa. i. 11, etc.
[176] Isa. lviii. 6.