How, let me ask again, is "the case of neuter insects" "demonstrative" against the "well-known" theory put forward in the foregoing chapter?
FOOTNOTES:
[208] 'Phil. Zool.,' tom. i., edited by M. Martins, 1873, pp. 25, 26.
[209] 'Phil. Zool.' tom. i. pp. 26, 27.
[210] Page 28.
[211] Pages 28-31.
[212] 'Phil. Zool.,' tom. i. pp. 34, 35.
[213] Page 42.
[214] Page 46.
[215] 'Phil. Zool.,' tom. i. p. 50.