[61] Woodworth, Robert S., Dynamic Psychology (N. Y., 1918), ch. iii, p. 54.
[62] “Anger, zeal, determination, willing, are closely allied, and probably identical in part. Certainly they are aroused by the same stimulus, namely, by obstruction, encountered in the pursuit of some end.” (Ibid., p. 149.)
[63] Thorndike, [op. cit.], p. 101.
[64] “To go for attractive objects, to grab them when within reach, to hold them against competitors, to fight the one who tries to take them away. To go for, grab and hold them all the more if another is trying to do so, these lines of conduct are the roots of greed.” (Ibid., p. 102.)
[65] M. Dide, a French psychologist, regards “the hypnosis produced by emotional shock—and this occurs not only in war but in other great catastrophies as well—as genetically a defence reaction, like natural sleep whose function according to him is primarily prophylactic against exhaustion and fatigue, ... it is comparable to the so-called death-shamming of animals.” (Dide, M., Les émotions et la guerre (Paris, 1918), Review of, Psychological Bulletin, vol. xv, no. 12, Dec., 1918, p. 441.)
[66] Wallas, Graham, The Great Society (N. Y., 1917), p. 136.
[67] Ibid., p. 440.
[68] Classed by William James as an emotion, but considered by McDougall a pseudo-instinct.
[69] McDougall, [op. cit.], p. 152.
[70] O'Connor, Chas. J., San Francisco Relief Survey (N. Y., 1913), pt. i, p. 6.