Carried forward $22,637 18

Plenary authority conferred upon the Commission by the parties interested, to cancel the Canal Commissioner's certificates of Feb. 10th, 1875, issued on account of the second John Hand award, delivered as a gift by Lewis H. Bennett to Thad. C. Davis, then Canal Appraiser; by Davis given to ex-Canal Commissioner Alexander Barkley, who claims to have mailed it to Lewis H. Bennett, though it appears from the evidence before us that, if mailed, it never reached him

2,000 00
2,000 00

Canal Commissioner's certificate, No. 184, issued Feb. 10th, 1875, under the second John Hand award, to Lewis J. Bennett, for $16,000, by him delivered under an agreement to the agent of Geo. D. Lord, and rendered void through testimony elicited by the Commission

16,000 00
16,000 00
$40,637 18
Accrued interest to February 14, 1876 2,259 21
Total $42,896 39

"The following sums are shown by the reports of this commission to the Executive to have been estimated to the contractors for work that was never performed, or was improperly paid for through erroneous classification, and for which the receivers should be required to make restitution:

Denison, Belden & Co.:
Port Schuyler to lower Mohawk aqueduct$157,337 02
Denison, Belden & Co.:
East of the city of Utica16,121 35
Willard Johnson:
Lower side-cut lock, West Troy30,595 65
Denison, Belden & Co.:
Bullard's Bend contract85,547 62
E. W. Williams:
Building vertical walls at Rome3,041 08
Flagler & Reilley:
Fort Plain contract5,845 35
S. D. Keller:
Jordan Level contract36,568 39
N. S. Gere:
Jordan Level contract8,801 90
Thomas Gale:
Jordan Level contract6,667 94
Hiram Candee:
Jordan Level contract17,567 33
$368,093 63
Add to this the balance yet due for money paid under the first John Hand award30,782 36
Total$398,875 99

"Large as these sums appear, we are fully impressed with the belief that they form but a fraction of the amount that is due to the State from similar sources.

"For the purpose of ascertaining more precisely the extent of this class of liabilities, and to protect the State in future from the irregularities and improvidence out of which they have arisen, we recommend that the Canal Board be clothed with ample powers and authority for taking testimony.