through the only merits of Jesus Christ

? Is it not the very nose which (of flesh or wax) this very Legislature insists on as an indispensable qualification for every Christian face? Is not the lack thereof a felonious deformity, yea, the grimmest feature of the

lues confirmata

of statute heresy? What says the reverend critic to this?

[Will]

he not rise in wrath against the Barrister,—he the Pamphagus of Homilitic, Liturgic, and Articular orthodoxy,—the Garagantua, whose ravenous maw leaves not a single word, syllable, letter, no, not one

iota

unswallowed, if we are to believe his own recent and voluntary manifesto

[3]

? What says he to this Barrister, and his Hints to the Legislature?