[360] 2 Hallam, Const. Hist. Eng. 23.
[361] Mr. St. John did not enter into a consideration of the legality of the modern impositions of the outports, levied by authority of the Crown.
[362] The digest of the argument here given is based upon that of Taswell-Langmead, Eng. Const. Hist. 446, 447, who follows closely 2 Hallam, Const. Hist. Eng. 23-27. Extracts from St. John’s speech are given in Gardiner, Const. Doc. 109-115.
[363] Taswell-Langmead, Eng. Const. Hist. 448. 2 Hallam, Const. Hist. Eng. 30.
[364] 2 Parl. Hist. 532, 533.
[365] 2 Ibid. 561, 562.
[366] 2 Parl. Hist. 362, 363.
[367] 2 Ibid. 568.
[368] 2 Ibid. 570, 571.
[369] 2 Parl. Hist. 582, 584.