[828] General Order of 26th April 1905, in Thirty-fifth Annual Report, 1905-6, pp. 321-2.
[829] Third Annual Report, 1873-4, pp. 126-30.
[830] Mr. Culley's Report, in Third Annual Report, 1873-4, p. 75.
[831] Minutes of Poor Law Commissioners, 1840; Poor Law Board to Mr. R. H. Paget, M.P., 5th January 1870, in Twenty-second Annual Report of the Poor Law Board, 1869-70, pp. 108-11.
[832] Selections from the Correspondence of the Local Government Board, vol. iii. 1888, p. 77.
[833] Once or twice it is mentioned by the inspectors; e.g. by Mr. Baldwyn Fleming in 1889 (Eighteenth Annual Report of the Local Government Board, 1888-9, p. 115), and again in 1891 (Twentieth Annual Report, 1890-1, p. 225).
[834] Thus, in 1901, sanction was obtained by the Bradford Guardians for the grant of non-resident relief in certain specific cases into which they had made careful inquiry. Among the cases thus accidentally reported for sanction, because they happened to be those of "non-resident paupers," were those of grants of 2s. to 6s. a week, in supplement of family incomes of 7s. to 26s. (Bradford Union to Local Government Board, 30th November 1901; MS. archives, Bradford Board of Guardians).
[835] 57 & 58 Vic. c 25.
[836] Local Government Board decision in Local Government Chronicle, 6th June 1903, p. 552.
[837] 4 Edw. VII. c. 32, sec. 1 (Outdoor Relief Friendly Societies Act 1904).