Time and Clocks: A Description of Ancient and Modern Methods of Measuring Time

by Sir Henry H. Cunynghame

He discarded authority, basing all knowledge upon reason, and protested against the theory that the study of words could be any substitute for the study of things.

Alluding to the mathematicians of his day, “This sort of men,” says Galileo in a letter to the astronomer Kepler, “fancied that philosophy was to be studied like the ‘Æneid’ or ‘Odyssey,’ and that the true reading of nature was to be detected by the collating of texts.” And most of his life was spent in fighting against preconceived ideas. It was maintained that there could only be seven planets, because God had ordered all things in nature by sevens (“Dianoia Astronomica,” 1610); and even the discoveries of the spots on the sun and the mountains in the moon were discredited on the ground that celestial bodies could have no blemishes. “How great and common an error,” writes Galileo, “appears to me the mistake of those who persist in making their knowledge and apprehension the measure of the knowledge and apprehension of God, as if that alone were perfect which they understand to be so. But ... nature has other scales of perfection, which we, being unable to comprehend, class among imperfections.

“If one of our most celebrated architects had had to distribute the vast multitude of fixed stars over the great vault of heaven, I believe he would have disposed them with beautiful arrangements of squares, hexagons, and octagons; he would have dispersed the larger ones among the middle-sized or lesser, so as to correspond exactly with each other; and then he would think he had contrived admirable proportions; but God, on the contrary, has shaken them out from His hand as if by chance, and we, forsooth, must think that He has scattered them up yonder without any regularity, symmetry, or elegance.”

In one of Galileo’s “Dialogues” Simplicio says, “That the cause that the parts of the earth move downwards is notorious, and everyone knows that it is gravity.” Salviati replies, “You are out, Master Simplicio: you should say that everyone knows that it is called gravity; I do not ask you for the name, but for the nature, of the thing of which nature neither you nor I know anything.”

Too often are we still inclined to put the name for the thing, and to think when we use big words such as art, empire, liberty, and the rights of man, that we explain matters instead of obscuring them. Not one man in a thousand who uses them knows what he means; no two men agree as to their signification.

The relativity of motion mentioned above was very elegantly illustrated by Galileo. He called attention to the fact that if an artist were making a drawing with a pen while in a ship that was in rapid passage through the water, the true line drawn by the pen with regard to the surface of the earth would be a long straight line with some small dents or variations in it. Yet the very same line traced by the pen upon a paper carried along in the ship made up a drawing. Whether you saw a long uneven line or a drawing in the path that the pen had traced depended altogether on the point of view with which you regarded its motion.

Fig. 21.

But the first great step in science which Galileo made when quite a young professor at Pisa was the refutation of Aristotle’s opinion that heavy bodies fell to the earth faster than light ones. In the presence of a number of professors he dropped two balls, a large and a small one, from the parapet of the leaning tower of Pisa. They fell to the ground almost exactly in the same time. This experiment is quite an easy one to try. One of the simplest ways is as follows: Into any beam (the lintel of a door will do), and about four inches apart, drive three smooth pins so as to project each about a quarter of an inch; they must not have any heads. Take two unequal weights, say of 1 lb. and 3 lbs. Anything will do, say a boot for one and pocket-knife for the other; fasten loops of fine string to them, put the loops over the centre peg of the three, and pass the strings one over each of the side pegs. Now of course if you hitch the loops off the centre peg P the objects will be released together. This can be done by making a loop at the end of another piece of string, A, and putting it on to the centre peg behind the other loops. If the string be pulled of course the loop on it pulls the other two loops off the central peg, and allows the boot and the knife to drop. The boot and the knife should be hung so as to be at the same height. They will then fall to the ground together. The same experiment can be tried by dropping two objects from an upper window, holding one in each hand, and taking care to let them go together.