| PAGE | |
| CHAPTER I. | |
| Beginnings | [1] |
| CHAPTER II. | |
| The Geography of the Greeks and Romans | [8] |
| CHAPTER III. | |
| The Dark Age | [33] |
| CHAPTER IV. | |
| The Mediæval Renascence | [42] |
| CHAPTER V. | |
| Portuguese Expansion and the Revival of Ptolemy | [51] |
| CHAPTER VI. | |
| The New World | [59] |
| CHAPTER VII. | |
| The Far East and the Discovery of Australia | [68] |
| CHAPTER VIII. | |
| Polar Exploration to the Eighteenth Century | [74] |
| CHAPTER IX. | |
| James Cook and His Successors | [87] |
| CHAPTER X. | |
| Measurement, Cartography, and Theory, 1500–1800 | [90] |
| CHAPTER XI. | |
| The Nineteenth Century: African Research | [107] |
| CHAPTER XII. | |
| The Nineteenth Century and After: Asia and Australia | [115] |
| CHAPTER XIII. | |
| The Nineteenth Century and After: The Poles | [122] |
| CHAPTER XIV. | |
| The Nineteenth Century and After: Evolution and Progress of Geographical Science | [135] |
| Short Bibliography of Geography | [147] |
| Index | [149] |
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
| A Missionary Looking Over the Edge of the World | [Frontispiece] |
| FIG. | PAGE |
| 1.—Tahitian Map | [2] |
| 2.—The World as Supposed to Have Been Conceived by Hecatæus | [11] |
| 3.—The World According to Herodotus b.c. 450 | [15] |
| 4.—The World According to Ptolemy | [28–29] |
| 5.—The World According to Cosmas Indicopleustes | [35] |
| 6.—Beatus’s Map | [38] |
| 7.—The Hereford Map | [47] |
| 8.—Chart of the Mediterranean, 1500, by Juan de la Cosa | [49] |
| 9.—Scaph | [91] |
| 10.—Astrolabe | [91] |
| 11.—Quadrant | [92] |
| 12.—Cross-staff | [94] |
| 13.—Davis’s Back-staff | [95] |
| 14.—Pretorius’s Plane-Table | [96] |
| 15.—Ramsden’s Theodolite | [97] |
| 16.—Modern Five Inch Transit Theodolite | [98] |
| 17.—The World According to Mercator (1587) | [100] |
Chapter I.
BEGINNINGS
We need not attempt any elaborate definition of Geography at this stage; it is hoped that a fairly clear idea of its field and functions may arise during the following brief summary of its history and evolution. The old-fashioned definition, “A description of the earth,” is serviceable enough if accepted in its widest sense. Geography may be regarded as the mother of the sciences. Whatever was the origin of man, whether single or multiple, and wherever he emerged into manhood, he was a wanderer, an explorer, from the first. Necessity compelled him to make himself familiar with his environment and its resources, and as the race multiplied emigration became compulsory. The more that relics of primitive humanity are brought to light, the further back must man’s earliest wanderings be dated. The five thousand years of the old Biblical chronology must be multiplied a hundred times, and still we find that half a million years ago our primitive forefathers must have travelled far from the cradle of the race. They were unconscious geographers. Their conceptions of the earth and of its place in the universe are unknown to us; it is not impossible to infer something of them by analogy of ideas existing to-day among more or less primitive peoples, though to do so is beyond our present scope. Yet it may be said that certain root-ideas of geographical theory and practice must surely date from the earliest period of man’s capacity for observation. Thus the necessity for describing or following a particular direction presupposes the establishment of a definite standard—the face would be turned towards the position of some familiar object; then in that direction and the opposite, and to the right hand and the left, four such standards would be found, and would become the “cardinal points.” The value, for this purpose, of so patent a phenomenon as the rising and setting of the sun must have been impressed upon human intelligence at an elementary stage. Again, map-making is not very far removed from a primitive instinct. Modern travellers have described attempts at cartography by the North American Indians, the Eskimo, and the Maori and other less advanced inhabitants of the Pacific Islands.
Fig. 1.—Tahitian map.
It is again beyond the scope of the present summary of the development of geographical knowledge among European peoples to attempt to give any detailed history of exploration; it is only possible to deal with the salient episodes, and these mainly in so far as they have influenced man’s general conception of the earth. Nevertheless, ages before the existence of any documentary evidence of its development geographical knowledge must have advanced far in other lands. America was “discovered” probably thousands of years before Columbus stumbled against the New World, or even the Norsemen had set foot in “Vineland”; it had time, before the Spaniards swarmed over it, to become the seat of civilizations whose origin is far beyond knowledge. It is worth noticing for our particular purpose that the European conquerors found evidence of highly developed geographical methods both in Central America and in Peru; the native maps were intelligible to them, and the Peruvian Incas had even evolved the idea of relief maps. China, again, a great power in early ages, possessed knowledge of much of central Asia; India was the seat of powerful States and of a certain civilization; Babylonia and Egypt were working out their destinies, and had their own conceptions of the earth and the universe, long before the starting-point of the detailed investigation within our present view.