[260]. In re Dean, 41 Ch. D. 552.
[261]. Ibid. p. 557.
[262]. Hereditas personae vice fungitur. D. 46. 1. 22. Creditum est hereditatem dominam esse, defuncti locum obtinere. D. 28. 5. 31. 1.
[263]. Williams v. Williams, 20 Ch. D. 659.
[264]. R. v. Raynes, 2 East P. C. 652.
[265]. Foster v. Dodd, L. R. 3 Q. B. at p. 77: “Whether in ground consecrated or unconsecrated indignities offered to human remains in improperly and indecently disinterring them, are the ground of an indictment.”
[266]. R. v. Stewart, 12 Ad. and El. 777. As to the lawfulness of cremation see Reg. v. Price, 12 Q. B. D. 247.
[267]. Williams v. Williams, 20 Ch. D. 659.
[268]. 2 & 3 Wm. IV. c. 75, sect. 7.
[269]. In re Vaughan, 33 Ch. D. 187; Hoare v. Osborne, 1 Eq. 587.