This is, however, not a matter of any very great importance for ordinary work, since the visual rays all lie in the neighbourhood of the yellow, so that opticians take care to correct their lenses for the rays in this part of the spectrum, and at the same time, as a matter of necessity, over-correct for the violet rays, that is, reverse the dispersion of the exterior lens, so that the violet rays have a longer instead of a shorter focus than the red, and, therefore, in looking at a bright object, such as a first magnitude star, it appears surrounded by a violet halo; with fainter objects the blue light is not of sufficient intensity to be visible. It is, therefore, always preferable to correct for the most visible rays and leave the outstanding violet to take care of itself; but nevertheless various proposals have been made to get rid of it. Object-glasses containing fluids of different kinds have been tried, but they have never become of any practical value, and it does not seem probable that they ever will.
In order to get rid of the outstanding violet colour when the remainder of the spectrum was corrected, Dr. Blair constructed object-glasses the space between the lenses of which were filled with certain liquids, generally a solution of a salt of mercury or antimony, with the addition of hydrochloric acid; for in the spectrum given by the metallic solution the green is proportionally nearer the red than is the case with the spectrum produced by hydrochloric acid, so that by the adjustment of the different solutions he exactly destroyed the outstanding colour of the ordinary combination. In this way Sir John Herschel tells us he was able to construct lenses of three inches aperture and only nine inches focal length, free from chromatic and spherical aberration.
It was proposed by Mr. Barlow to correct a convex crown-glass lens for chromatic aberration by a hollow concave lens containing bisulphide of carbon, a highly dispersive fluid, having double the power of flint glass. This lens was placed in the cone of rays between the object-glass and the eyepiece. Its surfaces were concavo-convex, calculated to destroy spherical aberration, and its distance from the object-glass was varied until exact achromatism was obtained. A telescope of this principle of eight inches aperture was made by Mr. Barlow, which proved highly satisfactory. In the early part of the last century it was proposed by Wolfius to interpose between the object-glass and eyepiece a concave lens in order to give greater magnification of the image, with a slight increase of focal length; if an ordinary lens be used the achromatism of the images given by the object-glass will be destroyed. Messrs. Dolland and Barlow, however, proposed to make the concave lens achromatic, so that the image is as much without colour when the lens is used as without it. Mr. Dawes found such a lens to work extremely well. These lenses, usually called “Barlow lenses,” are generally made about one inch in diameter, and by varying their distance from the eyepiece the image is altered in size at pleasure.
In the reflecting telescope, with which we will now proceed to deal, there is an absence of colour; but the reflector is not without its drawbacks, for there are imperfections in it as great as those we have been considering in the case of the refractor.
CHAPTER VII.
THE REFLECTION OF LIGHT.
We have now dealt with the refraction of light in general, including deviation and dispersion, in order to see how it can assist us in the formation of the telescope; and we have shown how the chromatic effect of a single lens can be got rid of by employing a compound system composed of different materials, and so we have got a general idea of the refracting telescope. We have now to deal with another property of light, called reflection; and our object is to see how reflection can help us in telescopes.
In the case of reflection we get the original direction of the ray changed as in the case of refraction, but the deviation is due to a different cause. Take a bright light, a candle will do, and a mirror fixed so that the light falls on its surface and is thrown back to the eye, Fig. [47], we see the image of the candle apparently behind the mirror; the rays of light falling on the mirror are reflected from it at exactly the same angle at which they reach it. This brings us in the presence of the first and most important law of reflection; and it is this, at whatever angle the light falls on a mirror, at that angle will it be reflected. As it is usually expressed, the angle of incidence, which is the angle made by the incident ray with an imaginary line drawn at right angles to the mirror, called the normal, is equal to the angle of reflection, that is, the angle contained by the reflected ray, and the normal to the surface. In order, therefore, to find in what direction a ray of light will travel after striking a flat polished surface, we must draw a line at right angles to the surface at the point where the ray impinges on it, then the reflected ray will make an angle with the normal equal to that which the incident ray makes, or the angles of incidence and reflection will be equal.
Fig. 47.—Diagram Illustrating the Action of a Reflecting Surface.
Very simple experiments, which every one can make will show us the laws which govern the phenomena of reflection. Let us employ a bath of mercury for a reflecting surface, and for a luminous object a star, the rays of which, coming from a distance which is practically infinite, to the surface of the earth, may be considered exactly parallel. The direction of the beams of light coming from the star, and falling on the mirror formed by the mercury, is easily determined by means of a theodolite, Fig. [48]. If we look directly at the star, the line I´ S´ of the telescope indicates the direction of the incident luminous rays, and the angle S´ I´ N´, equal to the angle S, I, N, is the angle of incidence, that is to say, that formed by the luminous ray with the normal to the surface at the point of incidence.