The next arrangement is one which Mr. Grubb has recently rescued from obscurity, and it is called the Cassegrainian form. It will be seen on referring to that, Fig. [56], if the small mirror, C, were removed, the rays from the mirror A B would come to a focus at F.
In the Gregorian construction a concave reflector was used outside that focus (at C, Fig. [54]), but Cassegrain suggested that if, instead of using a concave reflector outside the focus, a reflector with a convex surface were placed inside it, we should arrive at very nearly the same result, provided we retain the hole in the large mirror. The converging rays from A B will fall on the convex surface of the mirror C, which is of such a curvature and at such a distance from F, the focus of the large mirror, that the rays are rendered less converging, and do not come to a focus until they reach D, where an image is formed ready to be viewed by the eyepiece E. It appears from this, that the convex mirror is in this case acting somewhat in the same manner as the concave lens does in the Galilean telescope.
Fig. 56.—Reflecting Telescope (Cassegrain).
Fig. 57.—Front View Telescope (Herschel).
Then, lastly, we have the suggestion which Sir William Herschel soon turned into more than a suggestion. The mirror M in this arrangement is placed at the bottom of the tube as in the other forms, but, instead of being placed flat on the bottom it is slightly tipped, so that if the eyepiece is placed at the edge of the extremity of the tube all parallel rays falling on the mirror are reflected to the side of the tube at the top where the eyepiece is, instead of being reflected to a convex or other mirror in the middle.
This is called the front view telescope, and it enabled Sir William Herschel to make his discoveries with the forty-feet reflector. With small telescopes this form could not be adopted, as the observer’s head would cover some part of the tube and obstruct the light, but with large telescopes the amount of light stopped by the head is small in proportion to what would be lost by using a small mirror.
These are in the main the four methods of arranging reflecting telescopes—the Gregorian, the Cassegrainian, the Newtonian, and the Herschelian.
In order to make large reflectors perfect—large telescopes of short focus, because that is one of the requirements of the modern astronomer—we have to battle against spherical aberration.