[135]. Edin. Med. and Surg. Journal, xxvii. 441. The reader will remember that what was considered defective in the proof in this trial, the connection between the administration of a suspicious article and the first invasion of the symptoms, would now appear less so, for the reason assigned in note [[126]] p. [77].
[136]. Sur l’Empoisonnement par l’acide nitrique, p. 243.
[137]. Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, xxix. 19.
[138]. MM. Chevallier et Boys de Loury, in Annales d’Hyg. Publ. et Méd. Lég. xivv. 400.
[139]. MM. Lecanu and Chevallier in Annales d’Hyg. Publ. 1840, xxiv. 282.
[140]. London Medical Gazette, 1839–40, i. 575.
[141]. Dictionnaire des Sciences Médicales, Art. Indigestion, xxiv. p. 374.
[142]. Praktisches Handbuch für Physiker, iii. 292.
[143]. See also Dictionnaire des Sciences Médicales, Art. Rupture, xlix. 225.
[144]. Médicina Légale, ii. 22.