The statistical evidence from death certificates published in the decennial supplements of the Superintendent of Statistics[2] is of significance, not only in enabling comparison to be made between one industry and another, in regard to mortality from lead poisoning, but also in determining the other causes of death most frequently entered on death certificates of lead workers, and therefore, if they are in high excess, as compared with male workers generally, they are to be ascribed with some degree of certainty to deleterious effects of lead on some of the principal organs. Thus, in [Table X.] a list of occupations is given in which the mortality from plumbism in the years 1900 to 1902 was double or more than double the standard. It represents the mortality which would occur if the male population in the particular industry had exactly the same age population as that of “all males.” Further, the annual mortality among “all males” is taken as 1,000, and that of males engaged in the several industries is stated as a proportion of this. This “mortality figure” of 1,000 is made up of the mortality from various causes (of which only those considered to bear upon lead poisoning are given in the table) in the proportion stated.

The contention that, because lead workers die from certain diseases more frequently than “all males,” such diseases must be the sequelæ of lead poisoning is untenable unless other recognized causes of the diseases in question have been excluded. For excess of deaths from phthisis and respiratory diseases the conditions of work and exposure to inhalation of mineral and metallic dust or vitiation of atmosphere, in pottery, spelter, printing works, and file-cutting workshops, sufficiently account. The figures, indeed, take no account of this, and their value, in some at any rate, is still further diminished by the very large number of occupations (several involving no contact at all with lead) included in the headings. With exception of the strikingly greater proportion of deaths among lead-workers from Bright’s disease, the figures are too contradictory to draw deductions from as to what are “sequelæ” of lead poisoning. But this figure—160, as compared with 35 for all males—is confirmatory evidence, if any were needed, that chronic Bright’s disease is a sequela. And, from the pathology of lead poisoning, we believe that the granular condition of the kidney is due to the sclerotic change brought about in its substance by microscopic hæmorrhages. We have very little evidence indeed in man that this interstitial change is set up or preceded by an acute tubal nephritis. While we do not deny that there may be some parenchymatous change associated with lead poisoning, we do not believe that it is of the kind which gives rise to the large white kidney, and we should therefore exclude such disease as a sequela. But if chronic Bright’s disease is admitted, the train of symptoms associated with it—notably arterio-sclerotic changes resulting in cerebral hæmorrhage and albuminuric retinitis—must be admitted also. Unless it were established that granular nephritis were present in a lead-worker before commencement of lead employment, we think it would be useless to endeavour to prove that the condition was independent of lead, despite its comparative frequency as a cause of death apart from employment.

TABLE IX.—MAIN SYMPTOMS APPEARING AS THE CAUSE IN 264 DEATH CERTIFICATES OF LEAD POISONING.

Industry.Encepha-
lopathy.
Bright’s
Disease.
Cerebral
Hæmor-
rhage.
Paralysis.Lead
Poisoning.
Phthisis.Pneumonia,
Bronchitis,
Heart
Failure,
Colic,
Hernia, and
Aneurism.
Total.
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)
Smelting of metals 1 6 3 5 1 1 17
Brass works 3 1 1 1  6
Sheet lead and lead piping 1 1 1  3
Plumbing and soldering 2 3 1 2 1 2 11
Printing 3 3 2 5 1 3 17
File-cutting 111 2 2 2 1 19
Tinning and enamelling 1 1  2
White lead13 2 2 4 2 1 3 27
China and earthenware 82414 3 6 2 57
Glass-cutting 1 6 1 1  9
Electric accumulators 2 1 1 2  6
Paints and colours 4 1 2 1 3 11
Coach-making 1 8 5 610 3 4 37
Ship-building 1 4 1 1 1  8
Paints used in other industries 3 1 4 6 1 2 17
Other industries 1 2 111 2 17
Total38792627561325264
Average at death32434743443840

TABLE X.—COMPARATIVE MORTALITY FROM SPECIFIED CAUSES AMONG MALES ENGAGED IN CERTAIN OCCUPATIONS: 1900-1902.

Occupation.Causes of Death.
All
Causes.
Alco-
holism.
Gout.Phthi-
sis.
Diseases
of the
Nervous
System.
Diseases
of the
Circu-
latory
System.
Diseases
of the
Respi-
ratory
System.
Diseases
of the
Diges-
tive
System.
Bright’s
Disease.
Other
Diseases
of the
Urinary
System.
Plumbism.Acci-
dent.
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)
All males1,00016218610514517457 3517  159
Printer  994 8330011112513155 4215  221
File-maker1,700143872251983257813426 5646
Copper-worker1,090 7316210413935745 2421  351
Lead-worker1,408381651342223091416010252
Coach-maker  824 4412911312915046 3914  829
Earthenware1,493 828513121947357 3320 1033
Glass1,260 7428313117726854 5816  831
Painter and plumber1,11413821313310516831 7420 2350

Other conditions which might readily be admitted as sequelæ are optic neuritis, following on an attack of encephalopathy. No general statement can be made in regard to mental and nervous diseases, gout, pernicious anæmia, as sequelæ, as each must be considered in relation to the evidence adduced in the particular case, and after exclusion, in the first two, of syphilis as a cause.

The distinction between causation and association has to be borne in mind before admitting as sequelæ of lead poisoning diseases of bacterial origin, such as phthisis or pneumonia, or any disease to which the affected person may be thought to have been rendered more prone by reason of lead employment. The contention that a person may have been debilitated by lead poisoning is no proof that the enfeeblement of the constitution was the cause either of the bacillus gaining entrance into the lung or of the ultimate fatal issue from the engrafted disease. Such assertion in every case must rest on supposition. Evidence that lead employment predisposes to phthisis is not necessarily made stronger, in our opinion, by existence during life of clinical symptoms, or, in their absence, of detection of lead in the tissues post mortem.

In classifying causes of death, the general rule should be to select, from the several diseases mentioned in the certificate, the disease of the longest duration. Exceptions to this rule are that definite diseases ordinarily known as constitutional diseases should have preference over the other diseases mentioned. After thirty-five years of age, certificates of death from lead poisoning are almost always filled in in association with other diseases which are the usual causes which lead to mortality generally. But neither phthisis, nor pneumonia, nor any acute disease of the heart or lungs, nor valvular disease of the heart, nor, indeed, any acute febrile condition, can have direct relation with—i.e., be a sequela of—lead poisoning.

REFERENCES.