[401] Letter of Stanford to a committee of the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, 1873.
[402] Railroad Commission of Nevada v. Southern Pacific Company, 19 I.C.C.R. 238 (1910).
[403] San Francisco Bulletin, March 26, 1892.
[404] Ibid., October 12, 1892.
[405] Huntington manuscript, pp. 27-28.
[406] Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce of the House of Representatives on H. R. 9928 (55th Congress, 2d Session, March 26 to April 2, 1918, pp. 84-85, testimony W. S. McCarthy).
[407] Hearings before House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, sup. cit., pp. 170-71, testimony, L. J. Spence.
[408] Business Men’s League of St. Louis v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fé, sup. cit.
[409] Kindel v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fé Railway. 8 I. C. C. R. 608 (1900). In its first exercise of authority under the amended long-and short-haul clause, the Interstate Commerce Commission of 1911 prescribed the extent to which rates from eastern points of origin at and west of the Atlantic seaboard to Reno and other points upon the main line of the Central Pacific might exceed the rates to Pacific Coast terminals. (Railroad Commission of Nevada v. Southern Pacific. 21 I. C. C. R. 329 [1911].) Cf. Commodity Rates to Pacific Coast Terminals, 32 I. C. C. R. 611 (1915).
[410] Railroad Commission of Nevada v. Southern Pacific Company, 19 I.C.C.R. 238 (1910).