But the end of this text has not been reached with the date 9 Chuen 9 Kankin in F1 G1. Passing over F2 G2, the meanings of which are unknown, we reach in F3 an inverted Ahau with the coefficient 5 above it. As explained on page [72], this probably signifies 5 kins, the inversion of the glyph changing its meaning from that of a particular day sign, Ahau, to a general sign for the kin day period (see fig. [34], d). The writer recalls but one other instance in which the inverted Ahau stands for the kin sign—on the north side of Stela C at Quirigua.
We have then another Secondary-series number consisting of 5 kins, which is to be counted from some date, and since Secondary-series numbers are usually counted from the date next preceding them in the text, we are justified in assuming that 9 Chuen 9 Kankin is our new starting point.
Counting 5 forward from this date, according to rules 1, 2, and 3 (pp. [139], [140], and [141], respectively), the terminal date reached will be 1 Cib 14 Kankin, and this latter date is recorded in G3-G4. Compare G3 with the sign for Cib in A7 and in figure [16], z, and G4 with the sign for Kankin in figure [19], y, z. Moreover, since the Initial-series value of 9 Chuen 9 Kankin was calculated above as 9.12.14.10.11,
the Initial-series value of this new date, 1 Cib 14 Kankin, also can be calculated from it:
| 9. | 12. | 14. | 10. | 11 | 9 Chuen 9 Kankin |
| 5 | |||||
| 9. | 12. | 14. | 10. | 16 | 1 Cib 14 Kankin |
Passing over G5 as unknown, we reach in G6-G7 another Secondary-series number. The student will have little difficulty in identifying G6 as 2 uinals, 5 kins, and G7 as 1 katun. It will be noted that no tun sign appears in this number, which is a very unusual condition. By far the commoner practice in such cases in which 0 units of some period are involved is to record the period with a coefficient 0. However, this was not done in the present case, and since no tuns are recorded, we may conclude that none were involved, and G6-G7 may be written 1.(0).2.5. Reducing this number to units of the first order, we have:
| G7 | = | 1 × | 7,200 = | 7,200 |
| ([[189]]) | 0 × | 360 = | 0 | |
| G6 | = | 2 × | 20 = | 40 |
| G6 | = | 5 × | 1 = | 5 |
| —— | ||||
| 7,245 | ||||
Remembering that the starting point from which this number is counted is the date next preceding it, 1 Cib 14 Kankin, and applying rules 1, 2, and 3 (pp. [139], [140], and [141], respectively), the terminal date reached will be 5 Imix 19 Zac; this latter date is recorded in G8-G9. Compare G8 with the sign for Imix in figure [16], a, b, and G9 with the sign for Zac in figure [19], s, t. Moreover, since the Initial Series of 1 Cib 14 Kankin was obtained by calculation from the date next preceding it, the Initial Series of 5 Imix 19 Zac may be determined in the same way.
| 9. | 12. | 14. | 10. | 16 | 1 Cib 14 Kankin |
| 1. | 0.[[189]] | 2. | 5 | ||
| 9. | 13. | 14. | 13. | 1 | 5 Imix 19 Zac |
With the above date closes the known part of this text, the remaining glyphs, G10-G12, being of unknown meaning.