| B2 = | 0 × | 7,200 = | 0 |
| A2 = | 11 × | 360 = | 3,960 |
| B1 = | 13 × | 20 = | 260 |
| B1 = | 3 × | 1 = | 3 |
| —— | |||
| 4,223 | |||
Applying rules 1, 2, and 3 (pp. [139], [140], and [141], respectively) to this number, the terminal date reached will be 10 Ahau 8 Chen, which is nowhere recorded in the text (see fig. [79], A).
The Initial Series corresponding to this date, however, may be calculated from the Initial Series which we have assigned to the date 12 Caban 5 Kayab:
| 9. | 14. | 13. | 4. | 17 | 12 Caban 5 Kayab |
| 0. | 11. | 13. | 3 | ||
| 9. | 15. | 5. | 0. | 0 | 10 Ahau 8 Chen |
Although the date 9.15.5.0.0 10 Ahau 8 Chen is not actually recorded at Quirigua, it is reached on another monument by calculation just as here. It has a peculiar fitness here on Stela J in that it is just one katun earlier than the Initial Series on this monument (see fig. [78]), 9.16.5.0.0 8 Ahau 8 Zotz.
The other Secondary Series on this monument (see fig. [79], B) appears at B1-A2, and records 18 tuns, 3 uinals, and 14 kins, which we may write thus: 18.3.14. As in the preceding case, the date following this number in B2-A3 is its starting point, not its terminal date, a very unusual feature, as has been explained. This date is 6 Cimi 4 Tzec—compare B2 with the sign for Cimi in figure [16], h, i, and A3 with the sign for Tzec in figure [19], g, h—and as far as Stela J is concerned it is not fixed in the Long Count. However, elsewhere at Quirigua this date is recorded in a Secondary Series, which is referred back to an Initial Series, and from this passage its corresponding Initial Series is found to be 9.15.6.14.6 6 Cimi 4 Tzec. Reducing the number recorded in B1-A2, 18.3.14, to units of the first order, we have:
| A2 = | 18 × | 360 = | 6,480 |
| B2 = | 3 × | 20 = | 60 |
| B2 = | 14 × | 1 = | 14 |
| —— | |||
| 6,554 | |||
Applying rules 1, 2, and 3 (pp. [139], [140], and [141], respectively) to the number, the terminal date reached will be 8 Ahau 8 Zotz, which does not appear in figure [79], B. The Initial Series corresponding to this date may be calculated as follows:
| 9. | 15. | 6. | 14. | 6 | 6 Cimi 4 Tzec |
| 18. | 3. | 14 | |||
| 9. | 16. | 5. | 0. | 0 | 8 Ahau 8 Zotz |