[262] Bowditch, 1909: p. 279.
[263] The manuscript has incorrectly 16 Uo. It is obvious this can not be correct, since from Table [VII] Kan can occupy only the 2d, 7th, 12th, or 17th position in the months. The correct reading here, as we shall see, is probably 17 Uo. This reading requires only the addition of a single dot.
[264] In the text the coefficient appears to be 8, but in reality it is 9, the lower dot having been covered by the marginal line at the bottom.
[265] Counting backward 8.2.0 (2,920) from 9 Ahau, 1 Ahau is reached.
[266] Professor Förstemann restored the top terms of the four numbers in this row, so as to make them read as given above.
[267] The manuscript reads 1.12.5.0, which Professor Förstemann corrects to 1.12.8.0; in other words, changing the uinal from 5 to 8. This correction is fully justified in the above calculations.