[10] See Mr. H. Balfour’s interesting introduction to Pitt-Rivers’s Evolution of Culture, 1906, p. xiv.
[11] Guide to the Antiquities of the Stone Age (Brit. Museum), 1902, p. 76. See also Journ. Anthr. Inst., xxxiii, 1903, p. 18.
[12] Vict. Hist. of ... Sussex, i, 1905, p. 22.
[13] Proc. Dorset Nat. Hist. and Antiq. Field Club, xxi, 1900, p. 75.
[14] See A. Pitt-Rivers, Excavations in Cranborne Chase, iii, p. xii; iv, p. 28.
[15] Ib., iii, p. xiii.
[16] Mr. N. W. Thomas (Man, v, 1905, No. 25, pp. 47-8) points out that ‘some five years ago the Berlin collections [of ethnographical objects] from British possessions were seven times as large as those in our national museum, and since then this disproportion has not been decreased’, the reason being that ‘the men whom the nation pays to perform certain duties [in national expeditions] are permitted to retain the objects collected in the performance of those duties’. But the nation is to blame as much as the Government.
[17] See pp. 61, 385-90, infra.
[18] Lafcadio Hearn, Kokoro, p. 290.
[19] ‘Comme paléontologiste,’ says M. Marcellin Boule, ‘je crois fermement à l’existence de l’Homme tertiaire: je ne doute pas qu’on trouvera un jour ses traces’ (L’Anthropologie, xvi, 1905, p. 267).