[1245] Tacitus, Ann., xiv, 30; Diodorus Siculus, v, 31, § 3.
[1246] Chronica minora, ed. Th. Mommsen, iii, 1898, p. 182, 11, 14-7. Cf. E. B. Tylor, Prim. Culture, i, 1903, pp. 104-8; Rev. celt., xxvi, 1905, p. 289; and Sir A. Lyall, Asiatic Studies, ii, 1899, pp. 312-3. In regard to the Druidical practice of human sacrifice see N. Fréret, Œuvres complètes, xviii, 1796, pp. 264-72; Nouvelle rev. hist. du droit français et étranger, 1898, pp. 289-300; Rice Holmes, Caesar’s Conquest of Gaul, 1899, p. 533; and J. G. Frazer, The Golden Bough, iii, 1900, pp. 319-23, 326.
[1247] M. G. Bloch (Rev. internat. de l’enseignement, Août, 1895, p. 151), referring to Caesar (B. G., vi, 13, § 5), argues that the suitors who appealed to Druids probably all belonged to the upper class (equites), who, having unlimited rights over their dependents (ib., § 3), doubtless decided their disputes.
The meaning of the ‘awards and penalties’ (praemia poenasque) which the Druidical judges fixed is uncertain. See H. d’A. de Jubainville, Études sur le droit celt., i, 80-1; G. Dottin, Manuel pour servir à l’étude de l’ant. celt., p. 190; and Sir H. Maine, Early Hist. of Inst., 1875, p. 136.
[1248] Rev. internat. de l’enseignement, Août, 1895, pp. 149-50.
[1249] B. G., v, 55, § 3. Cf. viii, 30, § 1.
[1250] Ib., vi, 13, § 10.
[1251] Bibl. hist., v, 28, § 6.
[1252] Ammianus Marcellinus, xv, 9, § 8.
[1253] E.g. by Fustel de Coulanges (Rev. celt., iv, 1879-80, p. 53).