Ancient Britain and the Invasions of Julius Caesar

by T. Rice Holmes

[1586] Journ. Anthr. Inst., xxiii, 1894, p. 246.

[1587] Ib.

[1588] Journ. Anthr. Inst., xxiii, 1894, p. 246.

[1589] Ib., p. 248.

[1590] Even this, however, is not absolutely certain. See p. 62, supra.

[1591] Journ. Anthr. Inst., xxiii, 1894, p. 250.

[1592] Ib., p. 255. Cf. A. Pitt-Rivers, Excavations in Cranborne Chase, iv, 10 (pref.), note.

[1593] See Mr. W. J. Knowles’s valuable article in Journ. Roy. Soc. Ant. Ireland, 5th ser., vii, 1897, pp. 1-18.

[1594] Journ. Anthr. Inst., xxii, 1893, p. 98. See pl. iii and iv, facing p. 98. Mr. F. C. J. Spurrell (Proc. Geologists’ Association, xi, 1891, pp. 225-6, note) and Mr. Worthington Smith (Man, the Primeval Savage, p. 299) also regard certain British implements as mesolithic; and Mr. Spurrell (op. cit., p. 226) gives reasons for believing that the Tilbury skull belonged to a period of transition.

[1595] Anc. Stone Implements, 1897, p. 501.