[1656] Ib., p. 120, and figs. 52-5; Archaeol. Journal, iii, 1846, pp. 223-8.
[1657] S. Laing and T. H. Huxley, Prehist. Remains of Caithness, pp. 114-5.
[1658] It is very doubtful whether the Caithness skulls were neolithic (Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., xxxvi, 1902, p. 160, n. 1).
[1659] See pp. 408-9, infra.
[1660] The Races of Europe, p. 306.
[1661] Prehist. Remains of Caithness, pp. 128-30. Cf. Mem. Anthr. Soc., iii, 1869, p. 63. Huxley argued that these skulls were also virtually identical with those of the Australian aborigines; but on another occasion, as we have seen already (p. 377, supra), when his combative instincts were aroused, he affirmed the contrary.
[1662] Nature, Nov. 22, 1894, p. 92.
[1663] Journ. Ethn. Soc., N. S., ii, 1870, p. 449.
[1664] Ib., p. 444. Cf. Fortnightly Rev., N. S., xvi, 1874, p. 336; and W. Boyd Dawkins, Cave Hunting, pp. 155, 159, 164, 185, 187.
[1665] Proc. Soc. Ant., 2nd ser., iii, 1864 7, p. 282.