[584] See B. ix. c. 19.
[585] See B. ix. c. 32.
[586] Considered by Sillig to be the same as the “Saurus” of Chapter [28] of this Book; the “sea-lizard,” apparently.
[587] It does not seem to have been identified; though Rondelet says that it is the same as the Rascasse of the Mediterranean.
[588] See B. xx. c. 53, and Chapters [23], [30], [32], [34], and [35] of this Book.
[589] This fish has not been identified; indeed the reading is very doubtful.
[590] See B. ix. c. 24.
[591] A fish similar to the preceding one, probably; some kind of ombre, Littré thinks.
[592] See B. ix. c. 67.
[593] Probably the same as the “Myrus” of B. ix. c. 39.