“We find in Xenophon’s Banquet a very lively description of a republic in which the people abused their equality. Each guest gives in his turn the reason why he is satisfied. “Content I am,” says Chamides, “because of my poverty. When I was rich, I was obliged to pay my court to informers, knowing I was more liable to be hurt by them than capable of doing them harm. The republic constantly demanded some new tax of me; and I could not decline paying. Since I have grown poor, I have acquired authority; nobody threatens me; I rather threaten others. I can go or stay where I please. The rich already rise from their seats and give me the way. I am a king, I was before a slave: I paid taxes to the republic, now it maintains me: I am no longer afraid of losing: but I hope to acquire.”” (Book VIII.2)

Price inflation and wage growth in Holland 1950-2002

Table 20: Price inflation and wage growth in Holland 1950-2002

Source: Central Planning Bureau (January 2003)

Year % change % change 1951=100 1951=100
dlog P dlog wi P wi
1950 8.7 - 90 91
1951 11.1 10.4 100 100
1952 0.3 5.4 100 105
1953 -0.7 4.2 100 110
1954 4.0 9.2 104 120
1955 1.7 8.9 105 131
1956 2.1 8.6 108 142
1957 5.5 10.8 113 157
1958 1.6 4.4 115 164
1959 1.2 2.4 117 168
dlog P dlog wi P wi
1960 2.3 8.2 119 182
1961 2.1 7.2 122 195
1962 2.6 5.9 125 206
1963 3.8 9.0 130 225
1964 6.5 14.9 138 258
1965 3.6 11.1 143 287
1966 5.3 11. 151 319
1967 2.9 8.8 155 347
1968 2.5 8.9 159 377
1969 6.2 13.4 169 428
1970 4.4 12.8 176 483
1971 7.9 13.6 190 548
1972 8.3 12.6 206 617
1973 8.5 15.8 223 715
1974 9.5 15.6 245 826
1975 10.1 12.8 269 932
1976 9.0 10.9 293 1034
1977 6.1 8.7 312 1124
1978 4.5 7.2 326 1205
1979 4.3 6.1 340 1279
1980 6.9 6.1 363 1357
1981 6.3 4.2 386 1413
1982 5.3 6.3 407 1502
1983 2.8 3.8 418 1559
1984 2.1 0.5 427 1568
1985 2.2 1.8 436 1597
1986 0.2 2.1 437 1630
1987 -0.2 1.4 436 1653
1988 0.6 1.1 439 1672
1989 1.6 0.8 446 1685
1990 2.5 3.0 457 1735
1991 3.1 4.4 471 1811
1992 3.2 4.1 486 1886
1993 2.6 2.9 499 1940
1994 2.7 2.4 512 1987
1995 2.0 1.3 522 2013
1996 2.1 1.1 533 2035
1997 2.2 2.3 545 2082
1998 2.0 4.0 556 2165
1999 2.2 3.1 568 2232
2000 2.6 5.0 583 2344
2001 4.5 4.8 609 2455
2002 2.5 4.2 625 2559

Income distribution in Holland 1950 and 1988

Rijken van Olst (1969:97) provides the Dutch income distribution for 1950. Here income is measured in Dfl thousands (thousand guilders) of 1950, and the observed frequency concerns males with tax obligations. A Dfl is about 0.5 €.

The Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (1991:47) provides an income distribution for 1988, in Dfl thousands of 1988, and the observed frequency concerns the ‘active’ population with an income, i.e. exclusive of fulltime benefit recipients, but, in this case, also exclusive of independents.

Table 21 contains both distributions. Income class c[i] means that incomes from c[i-1] < c[i] are considered, so that c[i] itself is excluded. With f[c] the frequency observed for class c, we can compute the frequency density as f[c[i] / (c[i] - c[i-1]) or the frequency adjusted for the range concerned.

Table 21: Dutch income distribution for 1950 and 1988