In a former treatise I have laid down a plan for an effectual method of general practice, by which the spreading of the natural Small Pox will be prevented, and the cure of the inoculated rendered as easy and safe as possible to the patient.

I have therefore nothing more to add but my wishes, that the empire of Russia may meet with the utmost success from this discovery, under the reign of so illustrious and beneficent a Sovereign.

Years.General List of Deaths.Deaths from Small Pox.Under two Years of Age.
173426062268810752
352353815949672
3627581301410580
3727823208410054
382582515909600
39
174030811272510765
4132169197710456
422748314299030
432520020298621
442060616337394
452129612067689
462815732369503
472549413808741
482386917897637
492551626258504
17502372712298204
51210289987483
522048535388239
53192767747892
542269623598115
552191719887803
562087216087466
572131332967095
581757612735971
591960425966905
17601983021876838
612106315257699
622632627438372
63
642320223827637
652323024988073
662391123348035
672261221887668
76009866515268529

An objection to the practice of Inoculation considered.

From the time that Inoculation was introduced into this country one may date the opposition to its practice; many learned and ingenious men soon entered the field against it, and were encountered by others of equal abilities in its defence. The questions were warmly agitated, and in a short time foreigners of great name became authors on both sides. But the strength of argument on the part of the defenders of Inoculation, supported by the good success of the practice, hath almost silenced opposition; and the concurrence of the courts of Petersburg, Vienna, and France, who have submitted to the operation, and by their illustrious examples encouraged its progress in their dominions, will probably close the dispute in its favour.

One objection alone seems not to have been satisfactorily removed, which, although it does not relate to the safety or health of the patient, is yet of great importance to the community, and well deserves the most attentive consideration.

You have, say the objectors, produced accurate and satisfactory accounts and calculations of the alarming proportion of deaths that happen from the natural Small Pox, and also proved, that the loss sustained under Inoculation is inconsiderable. But admitting what you have advanced to be true, whence comes it that the same Bills of Mortality to which you appeal, prove also a certain increase instead of a diminution of deaths from the Small Pox, and that for such a series of years as to leave no room to dispute the fact? does it not naturally follow, that though almost the whole number of the inoculated recover, the disease must have been spread by their means, and a greater proportion having taken the natural disease, a consequent greater loss has been sustained by the public? If the above is admitted, it will be difficult to exculpate Inoculation from having been hurtful to society[[2]].


[2]. Extract from the Bills of Mortality, and a continuation of the estimate from page 19.