London: J. M. DENT & CO.
First Edition, February 1906
Reprinted July 1906
CONTENTS
| PAGE | ||
| I. | On the Natural History of the Man-Like Apes | [1] |
| II. | On the Relations of Man to the Lower Animals | [52] |
| III. | On Some Fossil Remains of Man | [111] |
| IV. | The Present Condition of Organic Nature | [151] |
| V. | The Past Condition of Organic Nature | [168] |
| VI. | The Method by which the Causes of the Present and Past Conditions of Organic | |
| Nature are to be Discovered.—The Origination of Living Beings | [186] | |
| VII. | The Perpetuation of Living Beings, Hereditary Transmission and Variation | [208] |
| VIII. | The Conditions of Existence as Affecting the Perpetuation of Living Beings | [225] |
| IX. | A Critical Examination of the Position of Mr. Darwin’s Work, “On the | |
| Origin of Species,” in Relation to the Complete Theory of the Causes of the | ||
| Phenomena of Organic Nature | [245] | |
| X. | On the Educational Value of the Natural History Sciences | [264] |
| (Lecture delivered at St. Martin’s Hall, July 22, 1854). | ||
| XI. | On the Persistent Types of Animal Life | [283] |
| (Lecture delivered at the Royal Institution, June 3, 1859.) | ||
| XII. | Time and Life | [287] |
| (Macmillan’s Magazine, December 1859.) | ||
| XIII. | Darwin on the Origin of Species | [299] |
| (Westminster Review, April 1860.) | ||
| XIV. | The Darwinian Hypothesis | [337] |
| (Times, December 26, 1859.) | ||
| XV. | A Lobster; or, The Study of Zoology | [352] |
| (Lecture delivered at South Kensington Museum, May 14, 1860). |
INTRODUCTION
Forty years ago the position of scientific studies was not so firmly established as it is to-day, and a conflict was necessary to secure their general recognition. The forces of obscurantism and of free and easy dogmatism were arrayed against them; and, just as in former centuries astronomy, and in more recent times geology, so in our own lifetime biology, has had to offer a harsh and fighting front, lest its progress be impeded by the hostility born of preconceived opinions, and by the bigotry of self-appointed guardians of conservative views.