The general meeting concurred, after some deliberation, with the committee; and a petition was signed by most of the Inhabitants of the city, for leave to bring in a bill for the several purposes mentioned in the report.

Unfortunately, however, the petition could not, from some unforeseen circumstances, be presented that sessions; it being a standing order of the House of Commons, that no such bill could be brought before Parliament, unless notice of it had been given at the preceding Michaelmas sessions: but it was suggested, seemingly from authority, that such notice, in the present instance, might be dispensed with, provided the city would abandon the toll, or a tonnage on goods.

To such a restriction, the committee would not submit; it therefore resolved to postpone the petition to the next sessions of Parliament, and, in the mean time, that a committee of Country Gentlemen, to be appointed at the ensuing sessions, should be requested to meet a sub-committee of the city, to hold a conference on the subject.

This conference took place, and after a number of queries had been proposed by the Country Gentlemen, to all of which satisfactory answers were returned in writing; notice of the intended application to Parliament was ordered to be affixed on the doors of the Sessions Hall, both in the county and city.

The committee however soon found, notwithstanding it had given what if deemed the most satisfactory answers to the queries suggested by the Country Gentlemen, that the bill would meet with the most determined opposition from the county; nor did it appear that the opposition could be obviated, unless the whole expence to be incurred by any intended improvements was confined to the city only. With such an opposition, the committee had no hopes of success; and whatever sentiments it might entertain of the liberality of the Country Gentlemen, who would, with the county at large, have materially partaken of the benefits and advantages attending the improvements, though they were unwilling to bear the most trifling part of the expence of them, it did not choose to hazard the experiment of a contest.

The committee, however, had the object entrusted to it too much at heart to abandon it entirely: it therefore relinquished all the former part of the proposed regulations, and confined itself solely to what it deemed the most expedient—the New Pavement. The Committee submitted a report on that subject only to a general meeting, on the 15th of December, 1800, the substance of which was, that, to carry the plan proposed into execution, a rate not exceeding 3d. in the pound, per quarter, on the rack-rent, should be levied on the Inhabitants of the city, at such times only when the poor rate was within 6s. per pound, per quarter, for three successive quarters.

At length, from considerations of the distress of the times, this truly interesting business was deferred, but we have authority, and are happy to say, that it will be resumed in a more favourable season.

We cannot quit this subject without observing, that the arduous and unremitted assiduity of the Gentlemen forming the Committee, met the warmest approbation of their fellow citizens, and afforded a prospect that, at a future period, their labours for so desirable an object would ultimately be accomplished.

References to the Churches in the Plan. [0]

A St. Martin’s at Oak S St. Peter’s Hungate
B St. Augustine’s T St. Michaels at Plea
C St. Mary’s U St. George’s Tombland
D St. George’s Colegate V St. Simon and Jude’s
E St. Saviour’s W St. Martin’s by Palace
F St. Paul’s X St. Helen’s
G St. James’ Y St. Giles’
H St. Edmund’s Z St. Peter’s Mancroft
I St. Clement’s I. St. Stephen’s
K St. Michael’s Coslany II. St. John’s Timberhill
L St. Swithin’s III. All Saints’
M St. Margaret’s IV. St Michael’s at Thorn
N St. Lawrence’ V. St. John’s Sepulchre
O St. Benedict’s VI. St. Peter’s Southgate
P St. Gregory’s VII. St. Etheldred’s
Q St. John’s Maddermarket VIII. St. Julian’s
R St. Andrew’s IX. St. Peter’s per Mountergate