Lao-tzu, A Study in Chinese Philosophy

by Thomas Watters

[24] See Legge Ch. Classics, vol. i, p. 21.

[25] See Legge, vol. i., p. 165.

[26] See Legge, vol. i., p. 152.

[27] Legge’s Shu King, vol. i., p. 60. See also Dr. Legge’s note on the passage. See also do. p. 257.

[28] See Li-chi, ch. 4, p. 52.

[29] See Legge’s Chinese Classics, vol. i., p. 14.

[30] See the 性理縹題, ch., 17, p. 2.

[31] A quotation from the Lun-yü, B. xv, ch. 28.

[32] Legge’s Shu king, vol. ii., p. 490. See also, vol. i., p. 209.

[33] Legge’s voL i., p. 65. Reference is apparently made to the Yi-ching where 謙 and 損 are two of the Diagrams. It is a wonder that this escaped Dr. Legge’s notice.