So they proceeded that night to introduce a mimeographed proposal preferring charges against my former wife.
Now I have borrowed this from a person who has kept the file because he was prevailed upon by my former wife and myself to act as her counsel during the course of that proceeding, and he kept a complete file.
I have here the original of the charges that were preferred against her, and the substance of it is simply this: That they were asking for my former wife to be expelled from that union and from the office of president in that union simply because she had been expelled from the Communist Party on a kangaroo court proceeding. And the names of the signers are here and in their own original handwriting. Some of them have been called before this committee before.
Mr. Velde. Is that for expulsion from the United Office and Professional Workers Union or from the party?
Mr. Dennett. No. This is the charges that were preferred in the Office Workers Union by members of the Office Workers Union who were also—they must have been members of the Communist Party. I didn’t know of them of my own knowledge, but my former wife did, and it is in their handwriting. Their names are there in their own handwriting. And I think the committee would like to know this and have this as a matter of record.
Mr. Tavenner. Will you read the names into the record.
Mr. Velde. If you are sure that they are all members of the party.
(The witness confers with his counsel.)
Mr. Dennett. My counsel raised the same question, Mr. Tavenner, that inasmuch as I cannot testify of my own knowledge about their membership, that perhaps it is not proper for me. However, this is the document which was used in that union.
Mr. Tavenner. Let me ask you a few preliminary questions.