Mr Williamson moved to substitute in place of it, the words of the Articles of Confederation on the same subject. He did not understand precisely the meaning of the article.
Mr Wilson and Docr Johnson supposed the meaning to be that Judgments in one State should be the ground of actions in other States, & that acts of the Legislatures should be included, for the sake of Acts of insolvency &c.
Mr Pinkney moved to commit Art XVI with the following proposition "To establish uniform laws upon the subject of bankruptcies, and respecting the damages arising on the protest of foreign bills of exchange."
Mr Ghorum was for agreeing to the article, and committing the proposition.
Mr Madison was for committing both. He wished the Legislature might be authorized to provide for the execution of Judgments in other States, under such regulations as might be expedient. He thought that this might be safely done, and was justified by the nature of the Union.
Mr Randolph said there was no instance of one nation executing judgments of the Courts of another nation. He moved the following proposition:
Executive or Judiciary shall be attested & exemplified under the seal thereof, such attestation and exemplification, shall be deemed in other States as full proof of the existence of that act–and its operation shall be binding in every other State, in all cases to which it may relate, and which are within the cognizance and jurisdiction of the State, wherein the said act was done."
On the question for committing Art: XVI with Mr Pinkney's motion
N. H. no. Mas. no. Ct ay. N. J. ay. Pa ay. Del. ay. Md ay. Va ay. Pa ay. N. C. ay. S. C. ay. Geo. ay.
The motion of Mr Randolph was also committed nem: con: