Mr. Doyle. It is not a photostat, but it does have substantially the information that is set forth in the telegram itself.
Mr. Rankin. Now, you have examined all of the exhibits, 206 through 227, both inclusive, and found them, except for what you and your counsel said about exhibit 221, and the card that was with 227, to be correct.
Mrs. Oswald. That is correct.
Mr. Rankin. We offer in evidence Exhibits 206 through 227, both inclusive.
The Chairman. They may be admitted.
(Commission Exhibit Nos. 206 through 227, heretofore marked for identification, were received in evidence.)
Mrs. Oswald. This is the card that goes with this letter, as an explanation.
(The card referred to was marked Exhibit No. 240 for identification.)
Mr. Rankin. Exhibit 240 is the card you have just referred to that goes with Exhibit 227, is that right?
Mrs. Oswald. Yes, sir.