Mr. Specter. Fine.
Mr. Kellerman. This same vehicle, I understand, is being completed with a bullet-resistant top and sides.
Representative Ford. Can you explain the difference between bullet resistant and the existing kind of the top?
Mr. Kellerman. I can't; I really can't. I have been behind on this thing and I am at a loss for a better answer.
Representative Ford. Could the present top deflect in any way, destroy the accuracy of a shot?
Mr. Kellerman. This would be a guess, Mr. Congressman. I would think that it would be deterred for, let's say, the velocity of a missile coming in at great speed, I think it would deter it; I don't think it would eliminate—it still would enter the top.
Representative Ford. The vehicle.
Mr. Kellerman. I am sure; yes, sir.
Representative Ford. But as far as you know the top that was available would not impede the projectile? Do you know whether or not it would deflect its accuracy?
Mr. Kellerman. Well, I have tried to study that, sir. The angle of the back as an example which is, what degree I don't recall, hoping that—of course, it was now known to be an upshot into the vehicle hoping that it would deter its force and so forth, but I really don't know. I kind of doubt it.