Mr. Eisenberg. Mr. Chairman, do you have any further questions on this?
Mr. McCloy. When you say you were able to determine it was fired from this type of rifle or one similar to it, that would include a number of different kinds of rifles besides the Mannlicher-Carcano?
Mr. Frazier. Yes, sir; it could include a variety of weapons with which I am not familiar in the foreign field.
Mr. McCloy. But it is definitely, according to your best judgment, a 6.5 mm. bullet?
Mr. Frazier. Yes, sir.
Mr. McCloy. And the bullet, such as we find it, has now characteristics similar to the type of bullet which was our Exhibit No. 399?
Mr. Frazier. Yes, it does. Placing them side by side, the cannelure, which is really the only physical characteristic apparent, comes to exactly the same place on both 399 and 573, indicating that this bullet was loaded to exactly the same depth in the cartridge—the two bullets, both 399 and 573.
Mr. McCloy. I think I have no further questions.
Mr. Eisenberg. Mr. Frazier, did any other firearms experts in the FBI laboratory examine the three cartridge cases, the bullet, and the two bullet fragments which you have testified as to today?
Mr. Frazier. Yes, all of the actual firearms comparisons were also made by Charles Killion and Cortlandt Cunningham. These examinations were made separately, that is, they made their examination individually and separately from mine, and there was no association between their examination and mine until both were finished.