Mr. Eisenberg. Did anyone who examined these various objects—as to which you have testified—in the FBI laboratory come to a conclusion different from the one you did?
Mr. Latona. They did not.
Mr. Eisenberg. Were there any identifications of fingerprints as being Lee Harvey Oswald's in addition to the ones which you have given us?
Mr. Latona. There were a number of identifications effected with latent prints developed on personal effects.
Mr. Eisenberg. No, sir; on the material you have testified as to today.
Mr. Latona. No; there were no others.
Mr. Eisenberg. Were any prints found—were the three fragmentary prints found on the rifle, which were not sufficient for purposes of identification, in any way inconsistent with the prints of Oswald which you found?
Mr. Latona. Very definitely, no. I might point out that actually what was visible was consistent, in the sense that even though there were no ridge formations available for purposes of making a positive conclusion, the indications were that the pattern types were there, were consistent with the pattern types which were on the hands of Lee Harvey Oswald.
Mr. Dulles. As far as you know the conclusions of the Texas police authorities who examined these objects, were your conclusions the same as theirs, or was there any differences between you on this subject?
Mr. Latona. Frankly, I don't know what there conclusion was.