Mr. Eisenberg. And the photograph on the left shows known samples of Oswald's pubic hairs?
Mr. Stombaugh. That is correct.
Mr. Eisenberg. So we have in effect two views of Oswald's pubic hairs, one on the left and one half of the composite photograph on the right?
Mr. Stombaugh. Yes.
Mr. Eisenberg. Following up on Mr. Dulles' question, the photograph on the right seems to have a much coarser and somewhat darker structure in both the known and the questioned sample than the photograph on the left, which is simply a known sample.
Mr. Stombaugh. That is correct.
Mr. Eisenberg. And you said that was because of the enlargement?
Mr. Stombaugh. The difference in the enlargement. The photograph on the left was taken with the microscope set to magnify the specimen 100 times. The photograph on the right was taken with the microscope set to magnify the specimen 400 times.
Mr. Eisenberg. The photograph on the right does not seem to show a hair four times larger, so I don't understand it.
Mr. Stombaugh. It was on the enlarging of the photograph itself.