Mr. Eisenberg. So that would correspond with the point you made as to "A," that there was very little nobbiness?
Mr. Stombaugh. Very little.
Mr. Eisenberg. And that is why there is no corresponding mark for nobbiness characteristic on the right-hand side, is that correct?
Mr. Stombaugh. That is correct.
Mr. Eisenberg. The right-hand side of 672?
Mr. Stombaugh. That is correct. Oswald's hairs, where the nobbiness did appear was in the lower third, in other words, the area from the root out on the shaft approximately one-third. The remaining two-thirds of the hair shaft all the way out to the tip was relatively straight, no nobbiness at all present. This was characteristic. Ordinarily a pubic hair will have this nobbiness two-thirds to three-fourths of the way up. So this was a characteristic which exists in Oswald's pubic hairs which is different from the ordinary or average.
Mr. Dulles. And you found that both on the hairs taken from Oswald himself and on the hairs found in the blanket?
Mr. Stombaugh. Yes; I did.
Mr. Eisenberg. Mr. Stombaugh, on this general point, when you make your comparison examination, do you come to your conclusions on the basis of what you see under the microscope, or on the basis of the photographs you take?
Mr. Stombaugh. On the basis of what I see under the microscope.