Mr. Eisenberg. At any rate, we are going to find out exactly what they did.
Representative Boggs. Yes. Go ahead.
Mr. Eisenberg. Now, just to elaborate on some questions which Mr. Boggs was asking earlier, Mr. Latona, referring specifically to this weapon, do you believe that a determination could have been made as to the age of the print found on the weapon which you have identified as being Oswald's print, and a lift of which is Exhibit No. 637?
Mr. Latona. No; I don't.
Mr. Eisenberg. You don't?
Mr. Latona. No; I don't.
Mr. Eisenberg. Are experts unanimous in this opinion?
Mr. Latona. No; they are not. There are some experts who contend that they can determine from the way the print develops, and they will use the term "fresh."
Now, on the other hand, so far as the definition of "fresh," then it resolves itself into an hour, a day, a week, a month. What is "fresh" as aside from an "old" one? And my opinion simply is this. That on the basis of the print itself, on the basis of the print itself I cannot determine how old it is.
Mr. Eisenberg. At least specifically on this type, or in particular focusing on this type of weapon?