Mr. Rowley. No, sir.
Senator Cooper. May I ask a question?
Mr. Rankin asked you several questions. He asked you if you had credible information, which I think was a proper question. But may I ask if you have any information based upon any facts that you know or based upon any information given to you by persons who claim to have personal knowledge, that there were persons engaged in a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy?
Mr. Rowley. I have no such facts, sir.
Senator Cooper. I address the same question as to whether you have any information that the killing of President Kennedy had any connection with any foreign power?
Mr. Rowley. I have no such information.
The Chairman. Mr. Dulles, any questions?
Mr. Dulles. Yes, sir; I have one general question.
From the testimony, and from my own study, it would seem to me that it was likely that there would be parallel, somewhat parallel structures to develop the investigative capabilities with regard to possible suspects in the area of Presidential protection. And my question is as to whether, in order to avoid that undue expense, you think there would be any advantage in putting the responsibility of that within the FBI, who would then be responsible for advising you as to potential suspects and possibly following up on that, rather than putting that responsibility now to a certain extent on the Secret Service—whether there is not a division of responsibility in this field which is unfortunate and may possibly lead to greater expense, personnel doing somewhat duplicative work?
Mr. Rowley. As it applies to this law now?