I think there is a clear distinction.
Mr. Rankin. It is your contention you can hold back part of it so that the Commission then is not able to verify what you do tell, the part you do tell?
Mr. Lane. Well, of course——
Mr. Rankin. Is that your position?
Mr. Lane. No, and I haven't said anything, I think, even comparable to that. I said one can testify if one has permission of the client in terms of the result of an investigation conducted by a client.
Mr. Rankin. Your conclusion about the testimony? Is that what you mean?
Mr. Lane. Not my conclusion. The result of the investigation, the result of inquiry. But at the same time it does not mean that an attorney's working documents are no longer sanctified documents.
Mr. Rankin. About the same matter; is that right?
Mr. Lane. Of course, about the same matter. Yes.
Mr. Rankin. Do you know of any law to support that position?