Mr. McCloy. Not Embassy; here is one from Mexico. Do we have that? We don't have these in our files, for example.
Mr. Belmont. This is subsequent to the assassination. You see your area of interest at this point is information, all information we had prior to the assassination. I did not remove from this file the items that started to come in subsequent to the assassination, you see.
Mr. McCloy. My feeling is that somebody on the Commission should examine that file. I can't come to any other conclusion after reading it all, because I don't know what is in it, what is in our record, and what is in that file. There is a good bit of material there that is narrative, which I think would be relevant. Certainly, I don't believe we can be possibly criticized for deleting or not producing a file which contains the type of information that you are speaking of. We are just as interested in protecting the security of your investigative processes as you are. But I don't think that when it is on the record that we have this file, that may contain material that was not in our files, and we are given the opportunity to examine it, without disclosing these confidential matters that we ought not to have somebody go through it.
Mr. Dulles. I agree with that but I think we could save time if we checked off first what we have already and that would cut out about half of that file probably.
Mr. McCloy. I think in a rapid glance through it, I think just about half of it.
The Chairman. Well, suppose you do that then, get those and let's see. All right, proceed, Mr. Stern.
Mr. Stern. I think perhaps we ought to leave the entire matter of the file then until we can give you the information.
The Chairman. That is right.
Mr. Stern. May we admit for the purposes of the record this list at this time, Mr. Chief Justice, which has been marked No. 834?
The Chairman. Yes. There are no security matters in this?